
My experience in the last week and a half confirms a few things for me: the value of AIESEC as a turboboost at the start of your career, the severe lack of HR personnel in Western Australia currently, and the opportunities you uncover when you put yourself out there.
Last weekend I adjusted my resume for the first time since August 2004 - I hadn't needed to in all that time. The jobs I've had never required me to submit a resume. But I had my whole AIESEC experience to put down, a fairly high profile 3 month internship in the WA department of premier and cabinet, various casual work, as well as student advising - everything in the last 2 and a half years of my life.
I got my parents and brothers to look over it and by Sunday night I was happy enough to send it out. I looked up a bunch of Human Resource companies (global, local, different industries, big, small) through the advertisements for HR graduates and various other HR positions on seek.com.au, as well as looking through the uni job board. I sent my resume and my grades to about 15 companies, unsolicited, and to a few other connected people I mostly know via AIESEC. In some cases I had to scour the company website to find an email address. Another idea would have been to make phone calls directly to HR directors, but I was on a roll on Sunday night and just sent my resume via email.
I really was just trying my luck, not expecting but rather hoping for a result. The response has been fantastic, especially given that it was the week before Christmas. I've had a couple of rejection replies along the lines of "we don't offer internships because of the nature of our work" and "we have nothing to offer at the moment", but I have been pleasantly surprised by half a dozen positive responses. I expect that I will get a few more nibbles in the new year as people come back from holiday leave.
I believe that targeting the small specialist recruitment companies was a particularly rewarding move. Often these companies may focus on the one sector, such as resources/mining, and may have deep and long held relationships with their clients. I've been told by two different companies that it was a good coincidence that I applied as they have some small hands-on project work that would be perfect for an intern to get stuck into. But coincidences aside, these smaller companies (by small they still may have up to 30 or 40 staff) probably wouldn't get that many students applying for internships with them, particularly unsolicited applications, and they may never get around to advertising for interns off their own bat. In this case it is less about coincidence and more about making your own opportunities by putting yourself out there.
What I'm looking for ideally is to collect as much work experience as possible across all the HR functions. I graduate in November 2007 and will be applying for graduate programs as early as August. With the time that I was committing to AIESEC available for use, ideally I will be working one or two days a week as an intern in various companies. I am very flexible in regards to time, length of commitment, self-directed project work or supervised office cubicle type work; basically I'm not picky and ready for anything. This is the message I sent out on Sunday night with the emails.
Thus far I've had two interviews and have organised two more for early January. The first was with a WA football league club and through conversation there transpired 7 different HR issues that need attention - from job description review and creation to checking on the legal status of certain employment arrangements. Very hands on, realistic, and exciting. I'd be working closely with the CEO and hours would be flexi-time. It would be unpaid work and could start in February, with a few issues requiring more immediate attention than others. I'm attracted to this internship because it's practical and challenging, there are real consequences and implications from my work. Additionally I could fit the work around university and student advising commitments. I have accepted the offer and will work out the arrangements at the end of January.
The second interview was with a small blue collar recruitment company focused on servicing the resources sector through the supply of various tradesmen - boilermakers, diesel fitters, electricians, instrument technicians, etc. I was disappointed with my performance in the interview as I was really nervous, much more nervous than I've been for a while. I still got an offer though, which I accepted, so I suppose it doesn't matter. The work will again be very hands on and practical; I will start off by getting stuck into reference checking. The resources boom has lead to insane competition from companies for good tradesmen with up to $4000 a week being offered at some locations up north. This has also lead to 2 things: a greedy environment where a few extra dollars will be enough for a worker to quit and work for a competitor (which reflects badly on the recruitment company), and unqualified or inappropriate candidates (through temperament etc) landing positions. I've heard crazy stories like some worksites stopping drug testing because they can't afford to turn workers away even if they do have traces of prohibited drugs in their system. It will be a paid internship and will be pretty much full-time from the first Wednesday of January (I will need to take time out for a few student advising activities in Jan though).
Lucas Elliot Trim was born on Saturday at approx 3pm to my brother Kieran and his wife Tamara. He's the first in what I'm sure will be many kids from my brothers and I. In this day and age with the diminished family life in Western culture, I hope to provide a nurturing, full and valuable family environment for my own family. Lucas will grow up with 6 uncles!!! He has every chance of being a sports star as we are all sports mad and we watch and play everything under the sun :)
He's about 24 hours old in this pic
I find this very interesting. In Australia the Howard government has been in place since 1996, a political party based on liberal philosophies, ie. decreasing regulation, reducing the government's size and role in the national economy, reducing overall tax burden to business... etc. Since the Liberals won the majority in the senate at the last election a whole raft of legislation has passed dramatically changing, among other things, the way the employment relationship is regulated and the rights and obligations of employer and employee. It's all been done for the sake of freeing up business to grow as quickly as possible, to be as competitive as possible on the world stage, to be as efficient as possible and thus increase overall standard of living nation wide.
However a recent report has found that the overall tax burden on Aussie businesses has actually increased by over 10% relative to the same time last year - and remains at a level near double that of the US and UK.
I wonder how high the level of corporate tax burden has been in the past, for instance over the last 20 years? I would expect it to have been reduced wholescale over the last 10 years at least.
-------------------
International comparison of corporate tax
Monday, 11 December, 2006
The Business Council of Australia (BCA) has released “Corporate Taxation: An International Comparison — 2006 Update”, which compares the overall burden of taxes on Australian companies with taxes in competitor countries, such as our trading partners, the OECD and the European Union.
The report, which was prepared in conjunction with KPMG, found that Australia's corporate tax burden has risen to 5.7% of GDP, up from 5.1% a year ago, more than double that of the United States and almost double the level in the United Kingdom.
The CEO of the BCA Ms Katie Lahey said that Australia must act now to reform our taxation system or we will jeopardise our economic prosperity and fall even further behind our international competitors.
I've got to say, the night was very well organised and coordinated - we had a great bunch of stakeholders, BOA, supporters, trainees, parents, many alumni, plus of course the current active crop of young leaders. The venue was good, the food delicious and plentiful (ususally you'd expect a few trays of finger food and that's it - what we were served constituted a whole dinner brought out throughout the night, it was great!), and the bar tab seemingly never-ending depite the fact it covered even boutique beers on tap! In an effort to provide balanced feedback I should add that there were sound issues with the speakers at the start. But they were fixed up and the night rolled on. The event was a real credit to the team that put it together, and it provided an excellent forum for outgoing members to set a high standard of event for the newer guys to aspire to in the future. Well done!
All my photos from the event can be viewed here.
If my last week were to have a theme, it would be India. Having been left a stack of Bollywood movies by my good friend Taylor, I have been making my way through them, generally watching a movie per day - and let's not forget how bloody long Bollywood movies are! When I was watching Chalte Chalte I seriously thought that the movie was over, only to see the 'intermission' screen come up, meaning it was only half way!! I laughed out loud - only a few 'western' movies I've ever seen, Titanic, LOTR series, etc run the same sort of length, and they are the exception to the rule. It is common for a Hollywood movie to run 80 to 120 minutes, but definitely not 180 or more. 3 times now I have gone to bed at intermission and watched the end of the movie the following day - I have to get used to budgeting 4 hours (interruptions included) for a movie. I've also gone to Annalakshmi twice with friends. Tomorrow we'll hopefully get a good bunch of people along again.
I haven't worked much at all this break. Today I will work at zipform for the first time in at least a month. Student advising has been very quiet as the semester has finished, although starting next week there will be some preparation work to do for next year, and I'll be in the office all day on Tuesday and Wednesday. But I'm happy, I'm enjoying the break SO MUCH! I've been exercising, hanging out with friends, and reading lots - exactly the things I wanted to do. I have some goals I want to achieve as well but they can wait till next week.
At the end of the latest note to staff from our university's Vice Chancellor was the note below. It seems to be that for Aussie students, study abroad is an opportunity that is not widely taken up. As AIESECers, we are well aware of the development opportunities available through living overseas. Hopefully this will enable more Aussie students to travel, and perhaps encourage not just those who will find a way to travel regardless. Australia has a reputation as a tolerant, accepting country - yet there are prominent pockets of our community that are as backward and bigoted as anywhere on Earth. The link between the Australian penchant for travel - particularly in a gap year between high school and university, during university, or straight after graduation - and our tolerant society cannot be dismissed. More people travelling = more cultured and worldly society.
To quote Mark Twain:
It liberates the vandal to travel--you never saw a bigoted, opinionated, stubborn, narrow-minded, self-conceited, almighty mean man in your life but he had stuck in one place since he was born and thought God made the world and dyspepsia and bile for his especial comfort and satisfaction.
- The American Abroad speech, 1868
Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the earth all one's lifetime.
- Innocents Abroad
---------------------
Outbound Student Exchange
I am very keen to encourage more of our Australian students to have an overseas educational experience, particularly a semester or a year on student exchange. We know that students who go on exchange add immeasurably to their own personal development as well as having a very significant educational and professional experience.
I am also very pleased, therefore, to announce that Curtin has been successful in winning $250,000 of funding from the Federal Government, specifically for student exchange. The programs for which funding is available are spread across the world, but focus in particular on universities in the Asia Pacific region.
This one pops up every now and then - the idea of New Zealand and Australia merging into a single nation. I've heard of this many times, and apparently the suggestion has a long history going back many years. Yes, our cultures do share many similarities, economies of scale would provide some efficiencies, a stronger currency, perhaps an increased ability to take a more prominent stand in world issues, larger military, yada yada.
We already have very close ties with NZ, from free movement and residency across boundaries, to economic and political pacts, to an agreement that Rugby Union is the only sport that they will ever beat us in. From what I understand, Australia could learn many things from the way NZ's indigenous Maori were historically treated and are currently treated in society - the situation here is surely one of the worst blights on our record and our national conscious, if we have one.
Closer ties are a good idea, but merging into a single nation won't happen. Just as there are many good reasons for Western Australia to break away into an independent nation - after all, West Aussies would probably be much better off - but if won't happen. We're all doing alright, people are content, things are cool... there are no real serious driving factors that would bring about any change in the status quo.
By the way, over 90% of WA's population, in the strip running north-south from Joondalup to Busselton, is far further away from even Adelaide, let alone the populous Eastern seaboard which holds the vast majority of Australia's population, than NZ is.
------------------------
Fed: NZ foreign minister rubbishes idea of union with Aust
Wednesday, 06 December, 2006
CANBERRA, Dec 5 AAP - New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters has ridiculed a proposal for his country to consider a full union with Australia.
A bipartisan parliamentary committee yesterday recommended Australia and New Zealand consider becoming one country.
The House of Representatives committee - which examined the possible harmonisation of the nations' legal systems - suggested much closer ties, including a common currency.
But the committee's report went a step further, recommending the nations consider a full union in the future.
Mr Peters said New Zealand wanted a close association with Australia, but there was no desire for a union. He rejected the idea as an exercise in "parliamentary adventurism".
"New Zealand is 1,200 miles (1,900 km) away from Australia and that's 1,200 reasons why I don't go along with that committee, nor will New Zealanders," he told the ABC's Lateline program.
January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 December 2007 January 2008
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]